Which form of enforcement is typically driven by complaints?

Reactive code enforcement is typically driven by complaints from the public or other stakeholders. In this approach, code enforcement officers respond to specific issues brought to their attention, such as violations concerning property maintenance, zoning, or health and safety regulations. This method focuses on addressing problems as they arise, rather than actively seeking out violations.

Proactive code enforcement, in contrast, involves the enforcement officers actively inspecting areas and properties to identify violations before receiving any complaints. Preventive code enforcement aims to implement strategies that prevent violations from occurring in the first place, often through education and outreach. Judicial code enforcement refers to the legal processes involved when compliance is not achieved through other means, often resulting in court decisions or other legal actions but does not inherently pertain to the initial reporting of complaints. Hence, the choice of reactive code enforcement aligns directly with the context of responding to complaints.